In reading Scamp's piece on Gorilla and it's origins, I expanded my comment into the post below.
The photo is an example of the interactive screen in the back of all Shanghai taxis which is full of basic, but engaging content you just can't help exploring as you wizz around what is fast becoming the fastest growing and most alive city of this new century. Remember if you go, you never tip the taxi drivers. Well, not yet.
Beyond the recycling of ideas which is the debate on in the comments...isn't the point that we (and the brands) have to realize that the consumer is the power now and they/us can decide what to watch, when and where so whatever we create has to be so far beyond advertising. Our ideas have to be compulsive and engaging enough to be remarkable, so we all spread it on free through online and offline WOM, and counting it as a success when it goes beyond it's niche audience (UK market for Gorilla), and breaking out and scaling around the world primarily through online. There are over 200 mash ups of Gorilla on youtube and countless other video sites. What does that say about our new world of audience participation where brands have to relinquish control of their brand image and let the prosumer trust, enhance and ultimately spread their brand message? Even the marketing guru Tom Peters’ blog commented on Gorilla which has a huge and influential audience...irony being it cost nothing in media spend, they just found it entertaining.
This leads me on to my next point that agencies have to compete with everyone now in the online content space and should fast invest in all kinds of ideas (from not just creatives, but from scriptwriters, film directors, game designers, actors, musicians, TV producers) whatever the talent, the cost, the length and less in traditional ad media spend. Although it has it's merits in the live events arena and isn't going to go away soon, in reality, we all know we all ignore or skip or just don't watch it as much.
As I said the (young and increasing older) consumer (prosumer?) is in control, and you have to trust them to comment,
Seen this? Supposedly consumer generated ad destruction of SONY PS3 (song) Wonder if it was produced by X-Box marketing team?
To spread the content, that means giving them entertainment (not advertising) that they're going to gain their attention, talk about, enjoy, embed and ultimately value. It's obvious. Whose making it obvious to the brands? Is it all the new net start ups, new tech coms, search companies meshing their tech and ideas that are eating away at the traditional ad world with no baggage or history of trad. ad models? Or is it the traditional ad agencies trying to shoehorn their old profitable ad models into this new liberating, uncontrollable, exciting online world where it's not just ideas but a future where the knitting of new tech, brands and ideas (Nike +) that matter and where now, within reason, you can quite literally try anything?
Even as your own brand, which you are, who or whatever you plagiarize, I, like everyone within and increasing out of the ad industry, will continue to follow your engaging imaginative exploits. Rock on Juan.